While the president has taken to Twitter to air his complaints about the Ninth Circuit, the White House Counsel's Office is taking steps to fill four vacant seats on the court.
- Why Google Is Losing the Battle Over Foreign-Stored Data
- Who Will Regulate Flying Cars?
- Airbnb Settles State Agency's Race-Discrimination Complaint
- Legal Technology Investing: A Tale of Two Companies
- New Chief Trial Counsel Is Named for California Bar
- On Patent Dance, Justices Struggle to Find Rhythm
Cody Harris of Keker Van Nest & Peters represented Santa Clara County in its fight against an executive order that threatened to withhold federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities.
It took her years to persuade some operating companies that RPX was there to help them, not hurt. In a Q&A, Yen looks back (and forward) as she transitions to the company's board of directors.
With the Federal Rules of Evidence (and Procedure), attorneys can protect themselves from the risk of an inadvertent disclosure. Being proactive by utilizing clawback agreements early in discovery is a significant, valuable step. Using these protocols can limit the damage if and when an inadvertent disclosure occurs.
The California Supreme Court just weighed in again on consumer arbitration agreements, and although the court gave a tip of the hat to the strong public policy favoring arbitration, it readily found the consumer arbitration provision invalid in McGill v. Citibank, No. S224086, Slip Op. (Cal. April 6).