This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.
View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here
Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com
What's being said
-
Why is it that every time a business seeks to back away from affirmative claims it makes about its products/services, it cries "puffery"? (Rhetorical question . . . ) As a user of Yelp who has been told -- by Yelp -- that certain of my reviews were pulled because Yelp determined I had not actually had the experience I claimed (or that an actual picture was not "representative" (whatever that means), I think this decision is spot on. Will be interested to see what kind of evidence discovery yields. I‘m willing to bet the email discussions are fabulous. Hope the lawyers fight Yelp‘s effort to subject everything to a protective order. Deception is not a trade secret . . .
Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.
Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202664538921
Thank you!
This article's comments will be reviewed.
ADD COMMENT