Federal Circuit Wrestles With Vulgar Trademarks in 'Fuct' Case

, The National Law Journal

   | 2 Comments

Less than three months after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act's ban on disparaging trademarks, the D.C.-based appellate court was asked to decide whether "Matal v. Tam" extends to marks that use dirty words or graphics.

This premium content is reserved for The Recorder subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

  • gearalleubag

    Want to be stress free, hassle free, and debt free? Why don’t you trade like me? Trading helped me a lot and I’m profiting more in this. You can Google Superior Trading System to learn how to trade and have that freedom that you’ve wanted in your finances.

  • American

    And so, this is what we have finally come to...

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202796840758

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.