The Supreme Court set off a patent law earthquake with its venue decision TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands. Three months later it's still unclear how far the shock waves will spread.
- Proposed California Bill Will Explicitly Protect Women Investors From Predatory VCs
- Pa. Judge Follows Suit in Ordering Google to Comply With Warrant
- It’s Official: Specious Cases May Have Merit
- San Diego Judge Severely Censured by Judicial Commission
- SF Judge Quizzes State Auditor in CJP Records Fight
- Nothing ‘Inappropriate’ to See Here. CFPB Defends Going to State Regulators As Court Stalls Subpoena
Jon Eisenman, an appellate lawyer in Los Angeles, tried five times to appear on "Jeopardy!" before he snagged a spot on the TV answer-and-question game show.
E-discovery professionals and litigators need to think differently about digital evidence, says Scott Reents. "The bigger story is that there is all this information out there, and we're drowning in it."
Review a discussion on 'Parrish, et. al. v. Latham & Watkins'. California law allows a case to be objectively specious, but nonetheless to have some merit. Hmmm.
Consider five practice tips for navigating FRCP Rule 26.